By team abhyaspeeth 
Abhyspeeth Education Desk
Mumbai : Mumbai University’s decision to increase fees for undergraduate and postgraduate programs from the academic year 2025–26 has triggered widespread backlash from student organizations across the state. Student leaders have criticized the move as unjust and exclusionary, especially in the absence of corresponding improvements in basic amenities across affiliated colleges.
The university issued an official circular on its website, signed by Registrar Prasad Karande, confirming the fee hike. This decision stems from a proposal passed in the University’s 2024–25 Academic Council meeting, now being implemented across all affiliated colleges. Consequently, these colleges have also increased fees for various academic programs.
However, student unions argue that the hike is unfair, particularly for students from marginalized communities. They claim that while the fees have been increased, infrastructure in many colleges remains substandard and does not justify the higher costs.
“The fee is being hiked without providing adequate facilities. This is a clear injustice towards students from disadvantaged backgrounds,” said Aamir Qazi, President of the All India Students Federation (AISF), Mumbai unit.
Siddharth Ingle, President of the Maharashtra Students Union, echoed these concerns, stating, “Students cannot afford this steep hike. According to Article 41 of the Indian Constitution, it is the government’s duty to provide access to higher education. The state must fulfill this responsibility.”
Adding to the criticism, Amol Matele from the Sharad Pawar faction pointed out, “The fee hike is unfair. Even the basic infrastructure in many colleges under Mumbai University is severely lacking.”
University authorities argue that while the government provides grants for teaching staff in aided courses, there is no such support for non-teaching staff salaries or unaided courses. Many colleges struggle to manage expenses, especially for self-financed programs, and rely on fee collection to sustain operations.
Still, students and activists question the timing and logic of the decision, especially when government support remains limited and economic pressures on families are rising. They fear the hike may push many students—especially from low-income backgrounds out of the higher education system.
The controversy has sparked calls for state intervention, with students demanding a rollback of the decision and urging the government to allocate more funds to ensure inclusive, affordable education.